To Cut Up Nightingales

What Makes an American Classicist?

Authors

  • Constanze Güthenke

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18422/76-2094

Keywords:

Basil Gildersleeve (1831–1924), Helen Magill White (1853–1944), Paul Shorey (1857–1934), American classical scholarship, Bacchylides, Aristophanes, Cambridge Tripos

Abstract

If the American “classic” is involved in the dynamic of canons, value, and style, then what is the role of Classics as a field, and of the professional classicist? I argue that with the emergence of the professional classicist came significant anxiety, particularly regarding the transformative and unsettling consequences of specialist research. By discussing ostensibly established classicists like Basil Gildersleeve or Paul Shorey alongside Helen Magill, the first American woman to receive a PhD in Classics, I aim to destabilize the center of what establishment may or may not have meant in light of a shared, unsettled preoccupation with what a professional approach to a canon and a classic could be and ought to be.

Author Biography

Constanze Güthenke

Constanze Güthenke is Professor of Greek Literature at the University of Oxford. Her main research area is the modern knowledge of antiquity, and she writes on Classics and classicisms in a range of national and comparative contexts. She is currently working on a book on classical scholarship in America as a history of disorientation.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-06

How to Cite

Güthenke, C. “To Cut Up Nightingales: What Makes an American Classicist?”. New American Studies Journal: A Forum, vol. 76, Feb. 2025, https://doi.org/10.18422/76-2094.

Issue

Section

Classical Liberal Education and its Discontents